 |
| RESEARCH PROPOSAL
Tilling Education: An Eco-Tech Aesthetic Approach By Mitchell Joachim "To talk to me about sustainability is like talking to me about giving birth,” "Am I against giving birth? No. But would I like to spend my time doing it? Not really. I'd rather go to a baseball game." - Peter Eisenman, “The Case for a Green Aesthetic”, Metropolis, Oct. 2001. 1. Agenda for Designing with the Ecology Greener and Grander After implementing environmental standards, why does green architecture look so bland? Passive cooling, low flush toilets, and harvested lumber do not foreground evocative design. During the last two decades, the prevalent challenge for the sustainable design movement in the United States has been to sluggishly modify the behavior of the developers, architects, and planners responsible for the sizable majority of new projects. From this outlook, it's not salient ensembles but uniform conventions that ought to stand as the peak objective for green advocates. I’ve considered such standardized aspirations as limiting and myopic. Admittedly this is not in tune with what would naturally be assumed or expected of green designers. This is not to disregard their gradual approach, only wondering where it arouses the construct visually. How can design complement our creative judgment and account for the environment? What does it take to re-create the "Bilbao effect" (artifact as stimulating catharsis) ecologically? The profession has to restructure its pedagogical goals, particularly assuming a balance and responsibility of giving aspirants a sufficiently bona fide command of environmental studies (Frampton). It is through formal education, as a conscious effort by design society to impart the skills and receptivity considered essential for social environmental dwelling. I propose to create a curriculum to educate professionals on the sensibilities of green design. Living Machines Designers should be encouraged to embrace coded principles of ecology, technology, and social science. For instance, Henry Ford pondered cars manufactured out of soy material and powered by ethanol. The prospects of fabricating automobiles that mesh with America’s agriculture economy and planned for decomposition via recycling were staggering. Envision the alternative if Ford had fashioned cars on an assembly line designed for the disassembly line later. It is a dialectic of decay vs. eternity that connotes industrial engineering with sustainable design culture. Teaching how to avoid these “end-of-the-pipe” strategies and still maintain good design is key. Why have not the leading American signature designers of today addressed these concerns? What will the anointed circle with their sleek blobs and macho white boxes finally attribute to innovation when their luster fades and the chemicals seep out? Green design continues to concentrate on a formal language that won't offend corporate America. “People will never want to have an aesthetically inferior building around, no matter how well stocked it is with cutting-edge thermal glass, photovoltaic cells, and zero-emission carpeting” (Wines). One researcher, Dr. John Todd, embraces the use of living machines that have successfully expanded possibilities for eco-technology. “The industrial idiom of design, failing to honor the principles of nature, can only violate them, producing waste and harm, regardless of purported intention. Our extravagant American energy usage policies are like using a chainsaw to cut butter.” He introduces site-specific concepts of bioremediation, purifying sewage, urban agricultural production, and restructuring energy. He advocates invoking solar income and biotic alchemy to gently substitute urban energy needs (From Eco-Cities to Living Machines: Principles of Ecological Design). The vital strategy is to investigate links among the many areas of knowledge and seek more specific study areas. It is this kind of quantitative research I am interested in expanding visually. Capacities, Footprints, and Development A proposition of development conforming to regional goals and subsequent conservation principals can enhance our environment and withstand all anticipated growth. Reducing our human impact on the earth is paramount, essential, and quantifiable. The maximum population of a species that can be sustained indefinitely in a given habitat is defined as a carrying capacity. Fully loaded, it anticipates the energy-embodied needs of future generations. This ecological footprint is based on a finite flow of natural income produced in our biosphere. It is crucial to render these diagnostics within design. Propositions for Technological Design Development: · The natural sphere is sensitive and visually agreeable. · Development is inevitable and must be accommodated aesthetically, indigenously, and biologically. · Uncontrolled muddled growth is ultimately destructive. · Progressive development must correspond to regional objectives. · Conservation doctrines inverse destruction and ensure enhancement, both of the terrain and the economy. · The natural sphere can admit eventual growth without anthropomorphic despoliation. · Coded is more desirable than unplanned growth. · Alliances fusing public and private powers are effective. · Design harmonizes biotic matter and the spirit of imagination. 2. Approach and Methodology; Three focus points for these investigations: (A) Assurance of Original Contribution, (B) Feasibility Constraints, and (C) Congruence with Research. A) Assurance of Original Contribution: New Code and Design The cipher of ecological design science has yet to be decoded. At the moment we lack suitable theories of immanence, satisfying images of how green design might be visibly refined. Pragmatist publications exist that undercut and depart from further design intuit. Paint-by-the-number eco-standards are recipes that brand projects green (LEED™, Energy Star, HOK Guidebook to Sustainable Design). These somewhat reductive models limit architecture’s ability to respond to the environment. Routine formula solutions preempted by magnanimous rants on saving the earth fail to elicit good design. Mending Standards Blanket assumptions of engineering and design misconceptions associated with artificially bounding an environment prevail. A wall, counter-intuitively, does not simply delimit the flow of heat. Heat does not have an exact border it can cross. It is measured at dynamic rates of perceptible exchange. Instead of spurious notions of boundary, designers should ruminate on concepts of flow, perception, intensity, and synergy. ASHRAE and IENSNA are independent building standards that compartmentalize energy issues. Fenestration, lighting, and HVAC are all quantified separately from one another. An overarching and facile theory of how nature fits is vital. Plenty of fixed compendiums moderately resolve these corollaries. William McDonough (“Eco-Effectiveness,” Sustainable Architecture White Papers, 2001), Sim Van der Ryn (Ecological Design, 1996), Ken Yeang (The Skyscraper Bioclimatically Considered, 1994), and Ian McHarg (Design with Nature, 1969) are highly beneficial strategies, but suffer from a deficiency to bestow qualities that additionally make something radiant and exquisite. The challenge I will address is to revamp conventional applications with design liberties. This suggests original directions and innovative approaches are essential. Curriculum of Design Provisions Write a code for teaching design technology and ecological fitness. This is a proposition to craft a curriculum for teaching professionals and academics that is not only informative sustainably, but also aesthetically celebrated. The premise is to invite freedom of association, not restraint on extents. It is an endeavor to deliver a balance between individuation and accord. The code may elaborate on the following didactic provisions: Urban Landscape Integration, Sustainable Materials, Visualization Technology, and Eco-philosophy within a History of Green Modernism. Range for Design Provisions Extents ranging from the urban dwelling to the enveloping ecosphere have calculable associations. These include the discrete evaluation of volumes, magnitudes, and locatable points of reference for design. Examples: Bedrock, geology, hydrology, existing vegetation including forests and their natural associations, slope, water table and soil limitations, method of recharge of the underlying aquifer, as well as present construction, historical landmarks, needs of the community, adaptive technologies, and individual species. B) Feasibility Constraints Duration of Study The objective is to have a written cogent program in a timely fashion. In order to negotiate design and ecology effectively, an appropriation of questions and defined problem areas should be set as priori. Previous queries register those principles and values. Time considerations involve research in the field of ecology and green design technologies framed by advisors. Also additive time is critical for relevant coursework to build and elaborate directives. At minimum it can take three to five years of classes, writing, and design research. The dimension that enables some ecological events occurring at a point in time to be distinguished is measured by the interval between human generations. A measure of time necessary to produce empirical results would take at least one such passing. Goals requiring those extended amounts of time (if deemed essential) will be scaled accurately, and reasonably. However, that order of research will strictly not fall within the scope of the final written program. C) Congruence with Research How do you discover the key linkages among the many fields of knowledge and lay the groundwork for more specific studies? My goal is to work with interdisciplinary advisors with the following spheres of interest: · Methods of Education in Design · Cause and Effects of Environmental Design · Eco-Philosophy and Green Modernism · Urban Landscape Integration · Visualization and Computer Technology Closing Observations on Ecological Design Making ecologies visible in the education of design technology and practice is vastly significant. These are the didactics for designing sustainability and tracing the path of nature. Cultivate explorations of deep ecology to retrieve the wisdom in mosaics, connectivity, biodiversity, patches, and matrices. Floating in our primordial soup is an inherent desire to imagine manifold events of wonderment. The first signal of humanist intent is our complex ensemble of education. Any good edification demands a theory of possibilities and interpretations. It seeks a genius loci revealed in both the struggle and the fellowship of numerous augmented assemblies. Designing across scales from turbulent urban regions to backyard gardens requires a filter of reason. It is my plan to qualify and disseminate these egalitarian practices of design with the natural science of ecology. Qualified by techno-scientific methods and routines, it is vital to admit that the practice of architecture is still at length a craft. |
 |
| + |
| MITCHELL JOACHIM ARCHITECTURAL + URBAN + ECO-DESIGN |